Paper Review Comments
In particular you are encouraged to substantiate negative comments.
Paper review comments. Please click on the file to view. Most reviews have four parts before reviewing a paper it is useful to consider the desired output. A review paper is not a term paper or book report.
It is not merely a report on some references you found. It is far more important to comment on the academic content of a paper than on grammar and punctuation. As a rule of thumb i roughly devote 20 of my reviewing time to a first overall impression browsing of the paper.
Paper review presentation presentation date. Referee s review form. There was clear scientific and.
Foundation of p2p computing spring 2010 department of computer science kent state university in this course we will take turn in reviewing and presenting a set of seminal papers in the area. The literature review was thorough the methodology was painstakingly thorough and incorporated the use of sufficient numbers of samples in dust size analysis and explosion tests. Detailed comments for author s please enter your comments for the author s giving your reasons for accepting or rejecting the paper by considering the following sugg ested points.
When writing a review you should describe the reasons for the recommendation so that the editor can make an informed decision. In this way you can categorize your comments for later inclusion in the best part. If the reviewers comment is not well founded in fact it should be quite easy to give a successful response.
The four parts of a review are. This was an excellent report on very thorough research. Expect to present about.